chvp/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Apply most of Peter's feedback

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Charlotte Van Petegem 2024-02-22 17:03:11 +01:00
parent 8b1515bd41
commit 8750bfdd16
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 019E764B7184435A
2 changed files with 80 additions and 49 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
bibliography.bib
View file

@ -2901,6 +2901,24 @@
file = {/home/charlotte/sync/Zotero/storage/HV4YWAEG/interpretable-ml-book.html}
}
@article{moonsAtomicReusableFeedback2022,
title = {Atomic, Reusable Feedback: A Semi-Automated Solution for Assessing Handwritten Tasks? {{A}} Crossover Experiment with Mathematics Teachers.},
shorttitle = {Atomic, Reusable Feedback},
author = {Moons, Filip and Vandervieren, Ellen and Colpaert, Jozef},
year = {2022},
month = dec,
journal = {Computers and Education Open},
volume = {3},
pages = {100086},
issn = {2666-5573},
doi = {10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100086},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557322000143},
urldate = {2024-02-22},
abstract = {Feedback has been recognized as a crucial element in the learning and teaching process. Although teachers know and accept this, they are not always eager to engage in this tedious and time-consuming activity. This study investigates how computers can work together with teachers to make the process of giving feedback more efficient by introducing a semi-automated approach (SA) with reusable feedback: when a teacher writes feedback for a student, the computer saves it, so it can be reused when following students make similar mistakes. We devised the concept of atomic feedback, a set of form requirements that could enhance feedback's reusability. To write atomic feedback, teachers have to identify the independent errors and write brief feedback items for each separate error. Our SA approach with reusable feedback was implemented in Moodle. During a crossover experiment with math teachers (n~=~36~+~9 in pilot study), we examined (1) whether SA saves time or changes the amount of feedback, as compared to traditional, paper-based correction work, (2) the extent to which the feedback was atomic, (3) whether atomic feedback enhances the reusability of feedback and (4) how teachers used and perceived the SA system. In light of the results, which suggest that atomic feedback is indeed reusable, we propose formal requirements for writing reusable feedback. Nevertheless, teachers did not save time using the SA system, but they provided significantly more feedback.},
keywords = {Architectures for educational technology system,Distributed learning environments,Evaluation methodologies,Human-computer interface,Improving classroom teaching},
file = {/home/charlotte/sync/Zotero/storage/XQTH79N6/Moons et al. - 2022 - Atomic, reusable feedback a semi-automated soluti.pdf;/home/charlotte/sync/Zotero/storage/AGV6NCUM/S2666557322000143.html}
}
@inproceedings{munaiahAssistedDiscoverySoftware2018,
title = {Assisted Discovery of Software Vulnerabilities},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 40th {{International Conference}} on {{Software Engineering}}: {{Companion Proceeedings}}},