Move footnote
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d002586a2
commit
9816406d66
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
4
book.org
4
book.org
|
@ -3340,9 +3340,9 @@ Another aspect is the fairness and integrity of evaluations using Dodona.
|
|||
The case study in Chapter\nbsp{}[[#chap:use]] details the use of open-book/open-internet evaluations.
|
||||
If students can use generative AI during these evaluations (either locally or via a webservice), and knowing that LLMs can solve most exercises on Dodona, these evaluations will test the students' abilities less and less, if students can use LLMs.
|
||||
The way to solve these issues is not clear.
|
||||
It seems like LLMs are here to stay, and just like the calculator is a commonplace tool these days, the same could be true for LLMs in the future[fn::
|
||||
It seems like LLMs are here to stay, and just like the calculator is a commonplace tool these days, the same could be true for LLMs in the future.[fn::
|
||||
The IMEC digimeter (a yearly survey on technology use in Flanders) showed that 18% of Flemish people used generative AI at least monthly in 2023.
|
||||
].
|
||||
]
|
||||
Instead of banning the use of LLMs, teachers could integrate the use of them in their courses.
|
||||
On the other hand, when children first learn to count and add, they do not use calculators.
|
||||
The same might be necessary when learning to program: to learn the basics, students might need to do a lot of things themselves, to really get a feel for what they are doing.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue