chvp/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Add further feedback from Bart

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Charlotte Van Petegem 2024-01-10 14:43:06 +01:00
parent b510670b45
commit b86f15f011
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 019E764B7184435A
2 changed files with 40 additions and 7 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

19
bibliography.bib
View file

@ -3558,6 +3558,25 @@
file = {/home/charlotte/sync/Zotero/storage/PQRWFWLJ/Vihavainen et al. - 2013 - Using students' programming behavior to predict su.pdf}
}
@article{vittoriniAIBasedSystemFormative2021,
title = {An {{AI-Based System}} for {{Formative}} and {{Summative Assessment}} in {{Data Science Courses}}},
author = {Vittorini, Pierpaolo and Menini, Stefano and Tonelli, Sara},
year = {2021},
month = jun,
journal = {International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education},
volume = {31},
number = {2},
pages = {159--185},
issn = {1560-4306},
doi = {10.1007/s40593-020-00230-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00230-2},
urldate = {2024-01-10},
abstract = {Massive open online courses (MOOCs) provide hundreds of students with teaching materials, assessment tools, and collaborative instruments. The assessment activity, in particular, is demanding in terms of both time and effort; thus, the use of artificial intelligence can be useful to address and reduce the time and effort required. This paper reports on a system and related experiments finalised to improve both the performance and quality of formative and summative assessments in specific data science courses. The system is developed to automatically grade assignments composed of R commands commented with short sentences written in natural language. In our opinion, the use of the system can (i) shorten the correction times and reduce the possibility of errors and (ii) support the students while solving the exercises assigned during the course through automated feedback. To investigate these aims, an ad-hoc experiment was conducted in three courses containing the specific topic of statistical analysis of health data. Our evaluation demonstrated that automated grading has an acceptable correlation with human grading. Furthermore, the students who used the tool did not report usability issues, and those that used it for more than half of the exercises obtained (on average) higher grades in the exam. Finally, the use of the system reduced the correction time and assisted the professor in identifying correction errors.},
langid = {english},
keywords = {Assessment,Automated grading,Embeddings,ML,NLP,SVM},
file = {/home/charlotte/sync/Zotero/storage/MCE4XEVP/Vittorini et al. - 2021 - An AI-Based System for Formative and Summative Ass.pdf;/home/charlotte/sync/Zotero/storage/YR42PAT9/vittorini2020.pdf.pdf}
}
@article{vonderwellActiveLearningPreservice2005,
title = {Active {{Learning}} and {{Preservice Teachers}}' {{Experiences}} in an {{Online Course}}: {{A Case Study}}},
shorttitle = {Active {{Learning}} and {{Preservice Teachers}}' {{Experiences}} in an {{Online Course}}},